Superbrand
 
  WHY STABILITY HAS AN EDGE OVER CHANGE
  by Pritish Nandy on Wednesday October 28 2009.
Did the election results surprise you?

About 50% people I know said yes, we were surprised. Why? They were surprised because they expected voters to chuck out this thoroughly useless, inept Government that has delivered on no front. The state’s infrastructure’s collapsing. So is this city’s. Power, water, trains, roads, everything’s a mess. On top of that, the recession, which the Government is in denial of, has made life extremely difficult for the common man who’s facing salary cuts, disappearing jobs, rising costs, investment risks. At the same time, the fear of random acts of violence like terrorist strikes and bomb blasts keep him always terrified. In rural Maharashtra things are worse, so much so that farmers keep committing suicide at a rate that would soon challenge hit and run cases on Mumbai’s roads.

On the other hand 50% people I know said no, we were not surprised. What else did you expect? When things are so difficult, do you really expect people to take a risk and vote for change? Every time we’ve voted for change, things changed for the worse. So why are you surprised we voted for stability and continuity? We may not have anything good going for us right now but we simply can’t afford another painful political upheaval. Let things get better; we will think about change. This is the time to hold on to what we have. Let’s give these rascals another shot and, who knows, maybe they’ll deliver. If they don’t, we can always chuck them out later. In short, these people may not be happy with the way things are but they would like to postpone change till things get better.

Interesting na? That in a country where 40% people go to sleep hungry at night, we are still hesitant to vote for change. So even though everyone hates to see Mumbai and Maharashtra being run so badly, only some crave for change. Others see change as a tricky option and would rather wait it out.

The arithmetic of electoral change is also curious. In every constituency, you have just one person representing the status quo. He or she is the face of both failure and continuity. Ranged against that single person are all your options for change. You can pick the one you like. You can choose any of the mainstream Opposition candidates or you can choose a rebel if you want or one of the many Independents, some with immaculate credentials and backed by NGOs. The very fact that there are so many options for change means the vote for change will always be split. This is what gives stability a clear edge.

The second factor in every election is the level of motivation to vote. It’s sheer nonsense to insist that every intelligent Indian must go out and vote. Not voting is as much a valid political decision as voting. It’s not laziness that stops people from voting. It’s disappointment. It’s the voter’s way of saying, I hate all these thugs and won’t vote for any of them. Give me a better choice. The less we vote, the more the parties are compelled to offer us more decent candidates. The kind of people they currently field is a downright shame and it gets worse with every election. In fact, if you want more people to vote, the answer lies in institutionalising the not voting option by adding a NOTA button. This will ensure the voter casts his or her vote and yet not vote for any of the candidates available. If NOTA gets maximum votes in a constituency we can demand a repoll with new candidates.

The funny thing in the arithmetic of Stability vs Change is that while Opposition parties have to strive for unanimity, to reduce the number of candidates representing change, those in power have to do nothing apart from sitting back and fomenting trouble in the ranks of the Opposition. The more dissidence you create in the Opposition, the easier it is to beat them. Political issues apart, even money can do the trick. Just keep paying more and more people to stand for election. It will only improve the odds for those in power.

In any case, now that stability has won the mandate and the Congress is all set to rule for another five years, maybe it’s time to focus on how to make the Government work. For some strange reason, most of believe we get a chance only once in five years to change the Government. Not true. You get a chance every moment, every day to voice your disappointment, your anger, your demand for change and you must voice it. It’s your democratic right. It’s also the only way to keep a Government working.

Luckily I am a journalist. It allows me to voice my frustrations. But there are many others who voice it as thinkers, poets, activists, playwrights, painters, politicians. They make Indian democracy such a vibrant institution. Respect this power, this opportunity. Use it.
Title
Name
Comments
 
Code Image - Please contact webmaster if you have problems seeing this image code Load New Code
 
        
Blog Archive
 
2010
   

IN PURSUIT OF FAME

THE CURIOUS APPEAL OF SALMAN KHAN

THE RISE OF $ BILLIONAIRES

THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY

THE DEFICIT OF TRUST

A NATION OF BANS

LEARNING TO SAY SORRY

A BANDH THAT WORKED

THE MAKING OF GOTHAM CITY

THE PRICE OF HONESTY

LEARNING STARTS WITH IRREVERENCE

The Power of No

THE AGE OF THE FORGETTABLE

A VERDICT FOR CHANGE

THE IRRELEVANCE OF THE BJP

FOLLOW THE MONEY!

WHERE HAVE ALL THE GOOD GUYS GONE?

WILL THE NET DISTORT HISTORY?

THE BLINDING POWER OF BLACK

THE WONDERLAND THAT'S INDIA

THE POWER OF CONTROVERSY

THE BUDGET AS TAMASHA

THE GIFTING OF LOVE

THE RHETORIC OF CHANGE

THE IMPORTANCE OF AWARDS

RENEWING THE CHASE FOR EXCELLENCE

The Art of Living

MYSTIQUE OF THE WHITE SHIRT
   
2009
   

EXIT, THE TALL, DARK, HANDSOME STRANGER

FLEEING THE PRISON OF TECHNOLOGY

LET’S GET BACK TO MAKING MOVIES

The Murder of a Sportsman

LETTERS, TWEETS, ONE PAISA SMS

LET’S STOP JABBERING ABOUT 26/11

WELCOME TO THE AGE OF EXCESS

WHO IS A HERO?

WHAT IS STAR POWER?

WHY STABILITY HAS AN EDGE OVER CHANGE

THE CHOICES WE MAKE

THE ART OF MANAGING FAME

WHY DO WE WANT OUR LEADERS TO BE SO BORING?

THE INQUISITIVE INDIAN

WORDS DIE. SO DO MOST THINGS

THE NEW POLITICS OF AUSTERITY

DO WE ALL HAVE A SELL-BY DATE?

THE POWER OF BREVITY

DOES GOOD STAND A CHANCE AT ALL?

THE PHATAPHAT GENERATION

MORNING SICKNESS NOW HITS US ALL

THE ONLY GENIUS I EVER KNEW

A FREE NATION IS UNAFRAID TO LIVE OUT ITS DREAMS

THE INDISCREET ART OF DADAGIRI

TRUTH OR DARE?

WELCOME TO THE AGE OF BLACKMAIL

END OF A ROMANCE

A CHANGING WORLD ORDER?

EXIT THE COMMISSARS

DID WE ACTUALLY VOTE FOR CHANGE?

HYSTERIA IS NO ANSWER TO TERRORISM

A NEW DEAL IN THE NEW YEAR?
   
2008
   

WHAT SHALL WE REMEMBER 26/11 FOR?
GRIEF, ANGER, OR CHANGE?

IS THIS THE CHANGE WE ASKED FOR?

GET THESE NETAS OFF OUR BACK!

THE KILLER APPEAL OF BAD BOY MARKETING

THE PLAUSIBILITY OF HOPE

THE ART OF INTOLERANCE

WAITING FOR A MIRACLE

PAPA DON'T PREACH

FIVE BLIND MEN AND MY HINDOOSTAN

THE ART OF THE CON

DO WE REALLY KNOW HOW TO FIGHT TERRORISM?

TIME TO REJECT OLD PLATITUDES

WAITING FOR A MIRACLE

LIVING ON THE EDGE

MANMOHAN SINGH'S LAST CHANCE

NOT JUST INFLATION, A NIGHTMARE

TIME FOR ANGER MANAGEMENT

THE LEGEND OF CHE

A STAR IS A STAR, NOT SUPERMAN

WINNING IS NOT ABOUT MONEY

LET'S LOOK FOR EASIER SOLUTIONS

SOFT POWER UNITES WHAT POLITICS DIVIDES

TIME TO SIGN THE NUCLEAR DEAL

A PIRATED COPY OF FREE INDIA

TOO MUCH TAMASHA KILLS THE GAME

IPL AND A THROWBACK TO OLD LOYALTIES

THE MOCKERY OF FIGHTING INFLATION

LET'S CATCH CRIMINALS, NOT JUDGE THEIR VICTIMS

THE POLITICS OF PROFLIGACY

APNA SAPNA MONEY MONEY

THE TRAGEDY OF REGIONAL POLITICS

WHY TAX PAYERS HATE PAYING TAXES

LOSING BY THE RULE BOOK
   
2007
   

WINNING IS EVERYTHING:

CHANGING STATUS SYMBOLS BY PRITISH NANDY

WHY TASLIMA NEEDS YOUR SUPPORT BY PRITISH NANDY

INDIA NEEDS THREE CRICKET TEAMS by PRITISH NANDY

STEP OUT OF THE PANIC ROOM OF THE PRESENT

PRITISH NANDY'S BEST INTERVIEW EVER

THIS NONSENSE ABOUT BIG FILMS