Superbrand
 
  The Power of No
  by Pritish Nandy on Wednesday June 09 2010.
It’s amazing how much power a single word wields. It’s a simple two letter word No that keeps redefining our politics every time. Look at West Bengal. Whether Mamta finally delivers or not on the expectations of the people out there, one thing’s clear. It’s the electorate’s unequivocal No to the Left that has won her the recent elections and told the CPM three decades later that it’s time to pack up and go. They can keep screaming and ranting and telling the whole world that Mamta’s in cahoots with the Maoists but that’s not going to change anything. When people say No, they mean No.

I have seen this happen before. Indira Gandhi was the darling of the nation when she whacked Yahya Khan and dismembered Pakistan in 1971. East Pakistan became a proud, independent Bangladesh. I was there in Dacca watching it all unfurl. There was no doubt that she had nerves of steel. But it all came to nought when she imposed the Emergency four years later, in flagrant defiance of the public mood. In weeks, the splintered Opposition found a common cause. Durga became a demon overnight and, as a perplexed Mrs Gandhi watched, the electorate turned its back on her. The Congress was booted out and she herself was defeated, no, not by any mighty leader but by a crackpot called Raj Narain. It was the power of No. India said No to Mrs Gandhi and her politics of the Emergency.

Another time was when India which had voted Rajiv to absolute power on Mrs Gandhi’s assassination (the Congress under his leadership won 411 seats out of 542 in the Lok Sabha) decided, post Bofors and the series of scandals that rocked his Government, that enough was enough. So when Rajiv went for a renewal of his mandate in 1989, the people said No to the man they had once showered so much love and sympathy on. He lost the elections and was forced to yield way to a man he totally hated and had once called a traitor. Not that VP Singh lasted long either. He surrounded himself with so many rascals, many of them inherited from Rajiv, that even before a year had passed he was gone, upstaged in turn by his bete noir Chandra Shekhar.

No is a hugely powerful word in Indian politics. When people say No, they don’t consider the consequences. No one gives a damn if Mamta and the Maoists are together. Just like no one listened when Mrs Gandhi warned that the Janata Party could never sustain itself in power let alone run India. The nation had simply decided that they didn’t want her. Nothing else mattered. Rajiv tried his best to best to convince the electorate that VP Singh was going to mess with India because he had nothing positive to offer, that his entire politics was based purely on hating the Congress. But did India listen? No. We went through a long patch of political uncertainty after Rajiv with the third front never convincingly demonstrating its ability to govern. But the Congress was clearly out. When India says No, it means No.

It’s a lesson the Congress learnt the hard way. So has the BJP. And now, the Left. When patience wears thin, the electorate says No without caring about the consequences. We give a long rope to our leaders but once we tire of their nonsense, it’s a one way ticket to oblivion. Deve Gowda has tried every trick in the trade but no one’s ready to even acknowledge he exists. Out is out. VP Singh, a cleverer man, went on self imposed vanavas and thought that was his route to recouping moral authority and (eventually) power. It didn’t help. LK Advani can keep trying but it’s unlikely he will ever return to power. Laloo’s gone. Not only India but even Bihar’s forgotten him. Remember Ram Vilas Paswan? He held the record for the largest margin of victory in any election and was even listed in the Guinness Book. Does anyone know where he is?

I have a simple belief. You can smell the rage of the people a long time before it actually translates itself into a No in the elections. But most people in power are too self absorbed, too full of hubris to notice. So they miss the tell tale signs. They see themselves as invincible. That’s when suddenly the electorate turns around and says Get Out! All the money you have accumulated, all the power you wield can’t save you then. Anyone can come from anywhere and blow on your mighty edifice and it will come crashing down.

Does change actually need a trigger? Sometimes. But not necessarily. A scam. A scandal. An Emergency. A Nandigram. A stupid, overbearing slogan like Garibi Hatao or India Shining. Anything can set it off. Everyone can see it coming except, funnily, those who are in power. The truth is: People decide to say No long before they find a reason to say it. As for the replacement, it easily finds itself. Without fail.

Title
Name
Comments
 
Code Image - Please contact webmaster if you have problems seeing this image code Load New Code
 
        
harrish panjwani
the popwer of no
its difficult to say weather its power of no or power of needs of change. human nature needs change for the sake of good.if someone provides good goverance and never gives a chance to think of alternate leadership, there would have no sense saying no. our leaders must understands this, that they must provide good goverance to remain in power.
Sunday, July 18, 2010 Top

1
Blog Archive
 
2010
   

IN PURSUIT OF FAME

THE CURIOUS APPEAL OF SALMAN KHAN

THE RISE OF $ BILLIONAIRES

THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY

THE DEFICIT OF TRUST

A NATION OF BANS

LEARNING TO SAY SORRY

A BANDH THAT WORKED

THE MAKING OF GOTHAM CITY

THE PRICE OF HONESTY

LEARNING STARTS WITH IRREVERENCE

The Power of No

THE AGE OF THE FORGETTABLE

A VERDICT FOR CHANGE

THE IRRELEVANCE OF THE BJP

FOLLOW THE MONEY!

WHERE HAVE ALL THE GOOD GUYS GONE?

WILL THE NET DISTORT HISTORY?

THE BLINDING POWER OF BLACK

THE WONDERLAND THAT'S INDIA

THE POWER OF CONTROVERSY

THE BUDGET AS TAMASHA

THE GIFTING OF LOVE

THE RHETORIC OF CHANGE

THE IMPORTANCE OF AWARDS

RENEWING THE CHASE FOR EXCELLENCE

The Art of Living

MYSTIQUE OF THE WHITE SHIRT
   
2009
   

EXIT, THE TALL, DARK, HANDSOME STRANGER

FLEEING THE PRISON OF TECHNOLOGY

LET’S GET BACK TO MAKING MOVIES

The Murder of a Sportsman

LETTERS, TWEETS, ONE PAISA SMS

LET’S STOP JABBERING ABOUT 26/11

WELCOME TO THE AGE OF EXCESS

WHO IS A HERO?

WHAT IS STAR POWER?

WHY STABILITY HAS AN EDGE OVER CHANGE

THE CHOICES WE MAKE

THE ART OF MANAGING FAME

WHY DO WE WANT OUR LEADERS TO BE SO BORING?

THE INQUISITIVE INDIAN

WORDS DIE. SO DO MOST THINGS

THE NEW POLITICS OF AUSTERITY

DO WE ALL HAVE A SELL-BY DATE?

THE POWER OF BREVITY

DOES GOOD STAND A CHANCE AT ALL?

THE PHATAPHAT GENERATION

MORNING SICKNESS NOW HITS US ALL

THE ONLY GENIUS I EVER KNEW

A FREE NATION IS UNAFRAID TO LIVE OUT ITS DREAMS

THE INDISCREET ART OF DADAGIRI

TRUTH OR DARE?

WELCOME TO THE AGE OF BLACKMAIL

END OF A ROMANCE

A CHANGING WORLD ORDER?

EXIT THE COMMISSARS

DID WE ACTUALLY VOTE FOR CHANGE?

HYSTERIA IS NO ANSWER TO TERRORISM

A NEW DEAL IN THE NEW YEAR?
   
2008
   

WHAT SHALL WE REMEMBER 26/11 FOR?
GRIEF, ANGER, OR CHANGE?

IS THIS THE CHANGE WE ASKED FOR?

GET THESE NETAS OFF OUR BACK!

THE KILLER APPEAL OF BAD BOY MARKETING

THE PLAUSIBILITY OF HOPE

THE ART OF INTOLERANCE

WAITING FOR A MIRACLE

PAPA DON'T PREACH

FIVE BLIND MEN AND MY HINDOOSTAN

THE ART OF THE CON

DO WE REALLY KNOW HOW TO FIGHT TERRORISM?

TIME TO REJECT OLD PLATITUDES

WAITING FOR A MIRACLE

LIVING ON THE EDGE

MANMOHAN SINGH'S LAST CHANCE

NOT JUST INFLATION, A NIGHTMARE

TIME FOR ANGER MANAGEMENT

THE LEGEND OF CHE

A STAR IS A STAR, NOT SUPERMAN

WINNING IS NOT ABOUT MONEY

LET'S LOOK FOR EASIER SOLUTIONS

SOFT POWER UNITES WHAT POLITICS DIVIDES

TIME TO SIGN THE NUCLEAR DEAL

A PIRATED COPY OF FREE INDIA

TOO MUCH TAMASHA KILLS THE GAME

IPL AND A THROWBACK TO OLD LOYALTIES

THE MOCKERY OF FIGHTING INFLATION

LET'S CATCH CRIMINALS, NOT JUDGE THEIR VICTIMS

THE POLITICS OF PROFLIGACY

APNA SAPNA MONEY MONEY

THE TRAGEDY OF REGIONAL POLITICS

WHY TAX PAYERS HATE PAYING TAXES

LOSING BY THE RULE BOOK
   
2007
   

WINNING IS EVERYTHING:

CHANGING STATUS SYMBOLS BY PRITISH NANDY

WHY TASLIMA NEEDS YOUR SUPPORT BY PRITISH NANDY

INDIA NEEDS THREE CRICKET TEAMS by PRITISH NANDY

STEP OUT OF THE PANIC ROOM OF THE PRESENT

PRITISH NANDY'S BEST INTERVIEW EVER

THIS NONSENSE ABOUT BIG FILMS